During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
，更多细节参见同城约会
9月17日，“户晨风被封”话题登上微博热搜。9月20日，户晨风的抖音、哔哩哔哩、微博、小红书账号被正式封禁，同时所有作品与动态被移除，9月30日浙江省委宣传部微信公众号“浙江宣传”发文批判其言论指其通过制造对立、煽动情绪来吸引流量，对户晨风的封禁升级，其各大平台账号消失。。同城约会对此有专业解读
[qjoly@fedora]~% cowsay，这一点在快连下载-Letsvpn下载中也有详细论述
"isValid": true,